|
Hibernation Economy A letter to David Kirkpatric, as a rebuttal for this article ( local copy) Mr. Kirkpatrick, I realize that the feedback from column is probably repetitive, and if someone else has presented this angle already, I apologize. I trained as an Electrical Engineer. It was supposed to be a field of great demand. It is of great demand. Just the demand for workers isn't in this country. You see, many of graduates in the class of 1999, are still looking for work. Those that did find work have been subsequently laid off. This isn't an education from a po-dunk U, or a mail-order university, this is Drexel University. This isn't a degree in Accounting, or Journalism, it is Engineering. Yes, yes, this sounds like a sob story. But I have a point. You compared the bickering of farmers at the end of the 19th century to the plight of white-collar workers today. Well, if a freshly minted 5-year degree in the latest emerging technologies, with 18months of job training as part of the curriculum, is not competitive enough, is not keeping up to date, what on earth would qualify in your book? There is a great demand for Engineers. Just not in this country. Wage pressure is find for day-laborers, but an Engineer requires years of training at great personal expense. (My school loans combined with my ex-wife's, also and Engineer, are more than the mortgage on our house.) We can't just "compete". We aren't given state-sponsored education. We can't buy houses for the prices available in the developing world. For god's sake, my textbooks per term cost more than my rent. I don't know how India can produce Engineers as cheaply as they do. Many of my classmates were African, Indian, Russian, Korean, and Pakistani, so equivalent training was not available in their home country. They paid the same amount I did to go to the same schools. They had the added expense of living in another country, so in the end it costs them more to train an engineer. So eliminating the cost of education we are left with three possible explanations for why costs are so much less for offshore labor: 1) The cost of living is radically less in these countries 2) companies aren't replacing engineers with people of equal qualifications 3) there is a deliberate move to depress wages in this country Number 1 is self correcting. All of the advantages of off-shoring will disappear as boom economies in these countries causes a worker shortage. Companies will have a few years of competitive advantage at best. Far too risky for far to little return, especially considering that offshoring for all it's "cost savings" is dreadfully expensive and disruptive to operations. Number 2 is self correcting. Experienced engineers are cheap at twice the price. An engineering mistake can cost a company billions in liability, product recalls, or fines from regulatory agencies. If your product kills someone, and the defect can be traced to using unqualified personell to design it, and your market valuation is in the billions, juries tend to tack on 6 or 7 zeros on damage awards. Number 3 ... well I don't want to touch evil conspiracy theories with a 10 foot pole. I for one don't attribute to malice what is better explained by stupidity. Would I be surprised to find a few smoking gun memos in the drawers of CEO's? No. If it is true, then the joke is on them. Soon they will be the most expensive part of a company, and shareholders will offshore their jobs too. If I had to wager a guess, number 2 is probably right on the money, judging by the extent to which business is lobbying to cap liability awards. How far that gets is anyone's guess. Politics is about as good to read as the weather. Tommarrow you can guess pretty well, but next week anything can happen. So despite my pangs of humanity, and labor sympathies, I actually find myself agreeing with you. While painful, this is just a temporary part of the business cycle. I will say though that I do see definite signs of deflation in my tea leaves. With the current debt level in this country that will not be a good thing. Sean Woods Armchair Economist
|


